Assignment: Data collection, Analysis and Evaluation Dissemination of Results

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

Assignment: Data collection, Analysis and Evaluation Dissemination of Results

Assignment: Data collection, Analysis and Evaluation Dissemination of Results

Data Collection

PICO Question and Quantitative Method. The restated PICO question is: why is it essential to train nurses to use the SBAR tool to prevent medical and surgical errors? The data collection that is preferable for the study is quantitative. The SBAR tool is proven as being an effective communication tool that is utilized by nurses in the advancement of care to patients. SBAR is an acronym that is utilized in nursing which stands for Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (Shahid & Thomas, 2018). The framework is also utilized in writing clinical reports of patients admitted in a medical facility. There are some nurses who have received training on how to utilize the SBAR tool while there are other without training in it. The survey method is the most effective method for the researcher to utilize. Therefore, the ideal data collection method is quantitative. Also, a questionnaire is an ideal data collection tool that can be utilized in collecting data from nurses, who have been sampled for the purpose of the study.

Survey Method. The choice of the survey method is primarily based on the ease of dissemination of the questionnaires and the ease of recruitment of a higher sample size. Finding the sample size that is representative of the study population is essential in ensuring that the findings of the study can easily be applied to the entire study population. Additionally, the quantitative structure of the method is easy to explain and to be understood by the respondents’ since they have to provide responses based on the options that are provided per question. Such will ensure that there is ease in the analysis of the data collected and higher probability of the respondents filling in the entire questionnaire (Harrington, Bosch, Schoofs, Beel-Bates, & Anderson, 2015). On the disadvantage, the respondents are limited on the responses that they can issue since all the questions are close ended (Watson, 2015). However, it is important to note that the responses in the survey need to be close ended to collect quantitative data since open ended questions would risk the researcher shifting to the qualitative method.

Three research assistants will be hired by the researcher to select the potential respondents and make calls to the target respondents. The calls will offer information on the objectives of the study, guideline on how the survey needs to be filled out and the method that they prefer to access the survey questionnaire. The existent methods upon which the survey tool will reach the respondents is either through e-mail or mail. Prior to the main study, a pilot test will be undertaken to test the reliability and validity of the research tool. Such will enable the researcher to adjust the questionnaire and capture the needed information that needs to be utilized under the survey.

Data Collection Points

The data collection process will take the format of a longitudinal survey. The key purpose of the longitudinal survey is to determine the consistency of the answers that the participants provide when the same research tool has been utilized and the capability of realizing validity in the responses that are issued by the respondents during the study. Notably, the data collection process will take place during base line, mid line and end line of the study. Such will be essential in analyzing the views that the nurses have towards the efficacy of SBAR tool and its use in the reduction of medical errors within the clinical setting.

Length of Time for Data Collection

The data collection process will take a total duration of twenty four weeks. The first week will mark the collection of the baseline data. During the 12th week, the mid line data will be collected and analyzed by the researcher. The end line will be conducted during the 24th week mark. This will then give room for the analysis of the data collected and writing report of the analysis and findings of the study.

Sources of Data

Self-reports are the main source of data that needs to be utilized by the researcher during the study. The self-report utilized during the study contains a set of close ended questions that the respondents will need to issue feedback based on the set of questions asked therein. Notably, the questions contained in the questionnaire are all close ended. The respondent will be asked to fill in the entire questionnaire based on the multiple choice provided. The primary essence of the self-report is to ensure that there is primary data that is essential for the researcher, based on the study topic and the research questions that are under investigation.

The other source of data is literature review. Seeking data from reportable journals is a notable source of quantitative data (Watson, 2015). The studies chosen need to be in tandem with the research questions and the topic that is under investigation. Additionally, there is need to affirm that there are no conflict of interest in the studies chosen and researcher bias is not passed to the current study that is in the roll out phase.

Data Quality

Taking up measures to ensure that there is validity and reliability in the research tool is essential in capturing the right information for utilization in the study. One of the notable measures that will be taken up is the presentation of the research question and the objectives of the study at the top most part of the questionnaire. The questions that are to be drawn into the study are to be based on the feedback that one receives from the study. Pilot testing and analysis of the data that is collected from the pilot study is essential in enabling the researcher to determine the extent to which the study instrument is both reliable and valid, thus, facilitating any adjustments that could be taken up prior to the undertaking of the final study. The pilot process will be participatory and the researcher will offer clarification to the pilot respondents and make adjustments to the questions that are deemed as not being clear for the purpose of the study. The pilot process will enable the researcher to keep the study short and precise and further take the study instruments for review with senior researchers who have previously published in an area closer or same to the study topic. Such will ensure that the professional comments regarding the study tool are integrated in the study design.

The Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion assignment The guidelines and rubric are located below.
NO PLAGIARISM, PLEASE, REFERENCE IS 5Y/O. PICO QUESTION is: why is it essential to train nurses to use the SBAR TOOL TO PREVENT MEDICAL AND SURGICAL ERROR. all references need a doi # or a credible website address.
NR505 Week SEVEN AssignmentLinks to an external site. I need double space

Purpose
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete their MSN EBP proposal. This assignment includes the final sections of the proposal which are data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion.

Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO #1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO # 1)

CO #2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes. (PO #2, 5)

CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 3, 5)

CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

 

Students are given the opportunity to request an extension on assignments for emergent situations. Supporting documentation must be submitted to the assigned faculty. If the student’s request is not approved, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:

Monday = 10% of total possible point reduction
Tuesday = 20% of total possible point reduction
Wednesday = 30% of total possible point reduction
If the student’s request is approved, the student will be informed of the revised due date. Should the student fail to meet the revised due date, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:

Monday = 10% of total possible point reduction
Tuesday = 20% of total possible point reduction
Wednesday = 30% of total possible point reduction
Total Points: 150 points

Requirements
Description of the Assignment

For this assignment, the student will complete MSN EBP project proposal by including the final sections of data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion.

Criteria for Content

The final sections of the proposal (data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results and conclusion) should be a maximum of 15 pages. Points will be lost for exceeding this length requirement.
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference pages must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
The paper should be presented in the following ordered sections:
Title Page
Data collection
Analysis
Evaluation
Dissemination of Results
Conclusion
References
4. Data Collection: In this section, students provide a comprehensive and detailed description regarding how data are to be collected. The required content includes:

A. For quantitative design the required content includes:

Restate the PICO/PICo question.
Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur
Identify the data collection points
Explain the length of time for data collection
Explain all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic)
Describe 2 (two) methods that will be useful in enhancing data quality
Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method.
B. For qualitative design the required content includes:

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Data collection, Analysis and Evaluation Dissemination of Results

Restate the PICO/PICo question.
Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts)
Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur
Explain the data collection points
Explain the length of time for data collection

Assignment Data collection, Analysis and Evaluation Dissemination of Results

Assignment Data collection, Analysis and Evaluation Dissemination of Results

Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation
Describe 2 (two) methods that would be used to enhance data quality
Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
Analysis: In this section, students provide a detailed explanation on how data will be analyzed.
For quantitative data the required content includes:
Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal
Describe one type of inferential statistics and their use in this EBP proposal
Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected analysis method
For qualitative data the required content includes:
Explain how data analysis is organized
Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal
Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design
Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected analysis method
Evaluation: In this section, students will present information regarding methods useful to objectively determine if outcomes from implementing this proposed EBP proposal would be positive for stakeholders as well as the nursing practice area reflected in their specialty track. The required content includes:
Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project
Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
Dissemination of Results: In this section, students will identify specific methods that may be used to share the results from successful implementation of this EBP proposal. The required content includes:
Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders
Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels
Conclusion: In this section, the student will identify a summary of their EBP project as well as consider the potential contribution to their specialty track practice setting. The required content includes:
Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project
Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting
8. Preparing the Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

The final sections of the proposal (data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion) should be a maximum of 15 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting this length requirement.
Headings are required and listed in above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements
Title page, body of paper, reference page(s), and appendix must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual.
Provide all of your references; formatted in APA style, as reference page(s).
Rubric
Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion (NOV18)
Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion (NOV18)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Data Collection
35.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: For quantitative design the required content includes: • Restate the PICO/PICo question.• Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Identify the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic) • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be used to enhance data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative design the required content includes: • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts) • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Explain the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be useful in enhancing data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
31.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: For quantitative design the required content includes: • Restate the PICO/PICo question. • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Identify the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic) • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be used to enhance data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative design the required content includes: • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts) • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Explain the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be useful in enhancing data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
28.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements For quantitative design the required content includes: • Restate the PICO/PICo question. • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Identify the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic) • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be used to enhance data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative design the required content includes: • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts) • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Explain the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be useful in enhancing data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
13.0 pts
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: For quantitative design the required content includes: • Restate the PICO/PICo question. • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Identify the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic) • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be used to enhance data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative design the required content includes: • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts) • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Explain the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be useful in enhancing data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: For quantitative design the required content includes: • Restate the PICO/PICo question. • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Identify the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic) • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be used to enhance data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method For qualitative design the required content includes: • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts) • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur • Explain the data collection points • Explain the length of time for data collection • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be useful in enhancing data quality • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis
25.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes: • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal • Describe one type of inferential statistics and its use in this EBP proposal • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis. For qualitative data the required content includes: • Explain how data analysis is organized • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis
22.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes: • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal • Describe one type of inferential statistics and its use in this EBP proposal • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis. For qualitative data the required content includes: • Explain how data analysis is organized • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis
20.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes: • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal • Describe one type of inferential statistics and its use in this EBP proposal • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis. For qualitative data the required content includes: • Explain how data analysis is organized • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis
10.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: For quantitative data the required content includes: • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal • Describe one type of inferential statistics and its use in this EBP proposal • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis. For qualitative data the required content includes: • Explain how data analysis is organized • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes: • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal • Describe one type of inferential statistics and its use in this EBP proposal • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis. For qualitative data the required content includes: • Explain how data analysis is organized • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluation
20.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
18.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
16.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
8.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Dissemination of Results
20.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels
18.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels
16.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels
8.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion
10.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting
9.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting
8.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting
4.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Paper Specifications
10.0 pts
This section included all of the following: • Paper meets length requirements of not exceeding 15 pages excluding title and reference pages • Headings are required and listed above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
9.0 pts
This section included three of the following: • Paper meets length requirements of not exceeding 15 pages excluding title and reference pages • Headings are required and listed above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements • . • A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
8.0 pts
This section included only two of the following: • Paper meets length requirements of not exceeding 15 pages excluding title and reference pages • Headings are required and listed above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements • A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
4.0 pts
This section included only one of the following: • Paper meets length requirements of not exceeding 15 pages excluding title and reference pages • Headings are required and listed above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements • A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
0.0 pts
This section included none of the following: • Paper meets length requirements of not exceeding 15pages excluding title and reference pages • Headings are required and listed above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements • Headings are present and consistent with APA format. • A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. • References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Style
10.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings. font, etc.), and reference page • One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present
9.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page • One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 – 3 APA errors were present
8.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page • One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA were are present
4.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page • One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA were are present
0.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page • One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Citations
10.0 pts
There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.
9.0 pts
There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty.
8.0 pts
There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
4.0 pts
There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
0.0 pts
There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Quality
10.0 pts
1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
9.0 pts
3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
8.0 pts
5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
4.0 pts
7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
0.0 pts
9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Deductions
0.0 pts
0 pts lost – submission met deadline
0.0 pts
Student does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days)
0.0 pts
Total Points: 150.0

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Data collection, Analysis and Evaluation Dissemination of Results

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.