PHI 2000 Assessment Normative Theories

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

PHI 2000 Assessment Normative Theories

PHI 2000 Assessment Normative Theories

You are called to consult in the Critical Care Unit of your
local hospital. 53-year-old JoEllen was admitted after taking an overdose of
prescription medications with alcohol. On admission, she said, “Not
supposed to be here . . . ,” but soon became uncommunicative, and her
condition is deteriorating rapidly. Her son has arrived with a notarized advance
directive in which JoEllen specifically asks not to be placed on life support.
What should you recommend to the attending health professionals?

Write a paper addressing this topic, supporting your
position with credible research. You may begin your research with suggested
Resources, but you are also expected to conduct your own independent research
into the scholarly and professional resources of the field. The Capella library
is recommended as a source for reliable materials.

In explaining your position, address each of the following

What features of the situation are relevant for making a
moral decision?

What would a deontologist like Immanuel Kant recommend?

What would a consequentialist like John Stuart Mill

How do you justify your own decision about what to do?

Additional Requirements

Written communication: Written communication should be free
of errors that detract from the overall message.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:PHI 2000 Assessment Normative Theories

APA formatting: Include a title page and a references page,
formatted according to APA (6th edition) style and formatting.

References: A typical paper will include support from a
minimum of 3–5 references. You may use some of the materials recommended in the
Resources, but you should also include support from your independent research
of scholarly or professional materials.

Length: A typical paper will be 4–6 typed, double-spaced
pages in length.

Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.

4.3.1 Participative Management—One Best Way

normative theory, Likert’s position was that any large organization could be considered as one of four possible systems. System 1 was authority centered, top-down, and unilateral; system 2 was a benevolent autocracy; system 3 was consultative (i.e., ask subordinates for their ideas and opinions but with the manager reserving the right to make the final decision); and system 4 was participative management with an emphasis on consensual decision making. Likert’s argument was that system 4 was the best way to manage an organization. OD practice that relies on this theory includes survey feedback and team consensus decision making (i.e., change to a participative form of management).

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.