PHI 2000 Assessment Personal Morality

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

PHI 2000 Assessment Personal Morality

PHI 2000 Assessment Personal Morality

Write a paper in which you explain your own basis for making
ethical decisions. You are welcome to employ what you have learned from your
study of traditional approaches, but you may also develop your own distinctive
approach. In either case, explain in some detail exactly what foundation and
process you rely on for choosing the right course of action, and support your
statements with research from professional or scholarly resources.

As part of your paper, select a contemporary ethical issue
about which you have strong convictions. It may be a social issue—such as
environmental ethics, marriage equality, or bioethics—or a more personal
issue—sexual morality, familial obligations, or care for the elderly, for
example. The choice is up to you, but make it something you care about enough
to make this project interesting and worthwhile. Address the following in
regard to your chosen ethical issue:

Summarize the issue and explain alternative views about its
resolution.

Assess both sides of the issue, critically analyzing the
advantages and disadvantages of each.

Finally, show how and why your own position is correct.
Think of this as an opportunity to persuade potential opponents of the
reasonableness of your view.

Additional Requirements

Written communication: Written communication should be free
of errors that detract from the overall message.

APA formatting: Include a title page and a references page,
formatted according to APA (6th edition) style and formatting.

References: A typical paper will include support from a
minimum of 3–5 references. You may use some of the materials recommended in the
Resources, but you should also include support from your independent research
of scholarly or professional materials

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:PHI 2000 Assessment Personal Morality

Length: A typical paper will be 4–6 typed, double-spaced
pages in length.

Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.

Assessment
1

Normative
Theories

You are called to consult in the Critical Care Unit of your
local hospital. 53-year-old JoEllen was admitted after taking an overdose of
prescription medications with alcohol. On admission, she said, “Not
supposed to be here . . . ,” but soon became uncommunicative, and her
condition is deteriorating rapidly. Her son has arrived with a notarized advance
directive in which JoEllen specifically asks not to be placed on life support.
What should you recommend to the attending health professionals?

Write a paper addressing this topic, supporting your
position with credible research. You may begin your research with suggested
Resources, but you are also expected to conduct your own independent research
into the scholarly and professional resources of the field. The Capella library
is recommended as a source for reliable materials.

In explaining your position, address each of the following
questions:

What features of the situation are relevant for making a
moral decision?

What would a deontologist like Immanuel Kant recommend?

What would a consequentialist like John Stuart Mill
recommend?

How do you justify your own decision about what to do?

Additional Requirements

Written communication: Written communication should be free
of errors that detract from the overall message.

APA formatting: Include a title page and a references page,
formatted according to APA (6th edition) style and formatting.

References: A typical paper will include support from a
minimum of 3–5 references. You may use some of the materials recommended in the
Resources, but you should also include support from your independent research
of scholarly or professional materials.

Length: A typical paper will be 4–6 typed, double-spaced
pages in length.

Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.